might help with their dreadful gender ratio for winners as only three women have won it since 1984.
because I really didn’t think that women could lose on a 3:1 ratio. How depressingly wrong I was – readers, the sole man shortlisted won. Now there are several ways of trying to understand this phenomenon:
Women are bad at producing modern art because they are just less artistic
Women are bad at producing modern art because there is just something intrinsically macho about it
Women aren’t bad at producing modern art, but men are better
Women are good at producing modern art but men are better
Women are good at producing modern art, but are overlooked because of masculinist structures of art competitions
Women are good at modern art but sexism of judges means they aren’t rewarded
I don’t know enough about art to say which I think it is, but I do know there is something fish when the female:male ratio of winners is 1:8 and even with a 3:1 ratio of winning, a male artist wins.
Meanwhile a “butcher surgeon” who left women with deformed breasts and other complications has been cleared to practice by the GMC. I somehow have visions of Michael Winner patronising patients by going “Don’t worry dear, it’s only your breasts”.
Consultant Brian Gwynn was found guilty of serious professional misconduct in his treatment of three of the patients but the medical watchdog said he had since “remedied the deficiencies”. One of the complainants alleged she had been “butchered” by Mr Gwynn who performed breast reconstructive surgery on her at Staffordshire General Hospital in January 2001. She was left with a hole in her stomach following the operation.
As the credit crunch bites, Britons may be turning to sex as a cheap way to pass the time, a charity says. A YouGov survey of 2,000 adults found sex was the most popular free activity, ahead of window shopping and gossiping….But the sexes differed on their priorities, with women preferring to gossip with friends while men had sex firmly at the top of their list.
Of course there aren’t any issues around a sexual double standard that might lead to women fearing being stigmatised if they put sex first… especially if they aren’t currently in a long-term relationship. No, of course not.
The reason we need to talk about whiteness is because it is everywhere. It has become so dominant that it is normalized in every social institution. Everywhere you look there is the influence of white culture. I am well aware that many view culture as something that belongs to “others”; you know the “exotic darkies” but trust me whiteness has its own unique culture.
Even though whiteness is highly visible for all to see, it is something that is rarely discussed. Usually when we discuss racism we attack it from the point of view of the person of colour. We talk about things like how the legacy of slavery still haunts blacks, or the ways in which Indigenous cultures continue to be colonized. but never do we associate that as an act in maintenance of white hegemony.
Whiteness does not just exist, it is active, vibrant and alive. Daily whiteness works hard to make sure that it is the centre of matters from the important to the trivial. If we only speak about race in terms of the way that it effects people of colour, we are denying whiteness as a race and as an active participant in racial hierarchy.
By 17 she had met the father of her three children and by 22 had their first son William. From then on family, home life and dealing with a failing relationship took over, she says. While Elizabeth “feels angry” at herself for not getting into work when she was younger, at the same time she believes looking after the kids and the house has been a job in itself.
Wait but hang on – this “workless household” includes a 21 year old son who served the Army in Iraw for three and a half years – i.e. since the age of 17 or so. No mention is made of whether the father of the children, who remained in contact with them post-separation, worked whilst he and Elizabeth were together. He was murdered in 2006. The eldest son was also viciously attacked and stabbed by a gang twice and is now basically agoraphobic.
So this “workless household” contains – 1. a fulltime homemaker, 2. an agoraphobic ex-soldier, 3. another full-time Mum (eldest daughter) and 4. a school aged child. The importance of this? Well the government has just re-iterated it’s commitment that lone parents (who are largely women) have to work after their child hits seven. Reasonable enough except that it basically says “Only the rich should have the privilege of choices about parenting” and “Parenting/homemaking isn’t an occupation – it’s just a waste of valuable economically productive time”. At the same time, of course, that “lone parents” are being blamed for “feral” youth – so you ain’t allowed to make a decision to parent them but you ain’t allowed to stay home with them either.